|
The
US Department of Homeland Security has released summary conclusions
from the TOPOFF 2 exercise that was conducted a few months ago.
This was the largest and most comprehensive terrorism response and
homeland security exercise ever conducted in the United States.
The following is the DHS statement concerning
the report’s publication (unedited):
"Our Nation must always be ready
to face a serious attack, and we must have confidence in our response
capabilities," said Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge.
"In the Department's second month, we tested our incident management
capabilities and pushed the response envelope at the federal, state,
and local level like in no exercise before. I want to recognize
the tremendous efforts of our new Department of Homeland Security
team and other federal, state, and local authorities around our
Nation who worked so hard to make TOPOFF 2 an unprecedented and
successful training event."
TOPOFF 2 was conducted from May 12 to May 16,
2003, and involved federal, state, local, and Canadian participants
in a full-scale exercise that assessed how responders, leaders,
and other authorities would react to the simulated release of weapons
of mass destruction (WMD) in two U. S. cities, Seattle, WA and Chicago,
IL. The exercise scenario depicted a fictitious, foreign terrorist
organization that detonated a simulated radiological dispersal device
(RDD or dirty bomb) in Seattle and released the pneumonic plague
in several Chicago metropolitan area locations. There was also significant
pre-exercise intelligence play, a cyber-attack, and credible terrorism
threats against other locations. Specific goals of Exercise TOPOFF
2 were to:
* Identify vulnerabilities in the response
system;
* Improve the nation's capacity to manage extreme events;
* Create frameworks for the operation of expert crisis and consequence
management systems;
* Validate authorities, strategies, plans, policies, procedures,
and protocols; and
* Build a sustainable, systematic national exercise program to support
the national strategy for homeland security.
The Secretary of Homeland Security, Homeland
Security Council, federal departments and agencies, and state and
local responders are working diligently to address the findings
identified during TOPOFF 2. DHS has led this effort on behalf of
the federal government to revamp, centralize, and unify a range
of pre-existing federal and other incident response contingency
plans.
This progress has been reflected in recent
interagency concurrence and approval of the Initial National Response
Plan (INRP) by the Secretary of Homeland Security in September 2003.
The INRP marks the first major step towards use of a single response
plan by all federal, state, and local responders and forms the basis
for the National Response Plan, which is currently under development.
The INRP established the Department of Homeland Security as the
lead federal incident response manager and created a permanent DHS
Homeland Security Operations Center (HSOC) - which is now fully
operational and continuously monitoring domestic incidents, law
enforcement, and intelligence reports; the Principal Federal Official
(PFO) to represent the Secretary on scene during domestic incidents;
and the Interagency Incident Management Group (IIMG), a special
team of experts from key departments and agencies convened by the
Secretary during national domestic incidents to advise on courses
of action and incident management.
DHS, in concert with an interagency team and
first responders, has also developed the National Incident Management
System (NIMS), which is currently in the final stages of review
by federal, state, and local partners. This document will support
the National Response Plan and proscribe standardized emergency
response organizational and procedural guidance across all federal,
state, and local sectors. NIMS will integrate incident management
best-practices into a comprehensive framework for use by all incident
management organizations nationwide. It also sets in motion the
process needed to leverage new communications technologies and approaches
to continue refinement of the NIMS in the future.
Analysis of the exercise focused on decision
and coordination processes, instead of examining specific participant
actions. This methodology provided a more objective and systematic
assessment of the many components that supported each of the analytical
categories listed below. Major conclusions for each of these categories
and post-exercise activity are summarized as follows:
* Emergency Public Policy and Decision-Making. The exercise and
venue activity in Seattle and Chicago provided important lessons
in federal, state, and local integration that will be valuable to
other states and localities as they refine their respective programs.
The exercise further challenged decision-makers with two critical
decisions that have not occurred in the real world: (1) Elevation
of the threat condition to Red by federal, state, and local authorities;
and (2) A request for issuance of Presidential declarations to cover
the RDD and bioterrorism attacks.
Post-TOPOFF 2: Since TOPOFF 2, DHS and the
interagency team have responded to and managed complex natural or
no-notice domestic incidents, including Hurricane Isabel and the
Northeast U. S. blackout. The teamwork demonstrated by authorities
during these difficult incidents gave other decision-makers the
facts and information they needed to organize and deploy federal
and other assistance. DHS continues to work with state and local
partners and the private sector in developing standards for security
measures as the Homeland Security Advisory System is raised and
lowered.
* Emergency Public Information. Dissemination
of a unified message during domestic incidents is a critical response
activity and TOPOFF 2 provided a superb opportunity to exercise
and test public information strategies. Consistency in message deployment
was a major challenge and spotlighted the need to improve communications
with field joint information centers (JICs), management of rumors,
and employment of pre-coordinated information packages.
Post-TOPOFF 2: DHS has led an intensive interagency effort that
has resulted in the creation of an interagency incident communications
strategy, emergency communications protocols, and vastly improved
federal, state, and local coordination. This process has further
been used to coordinate interagency homeland security incident communications
activity during a number of recent incidents including ricin and
anthrax scares.
* Communications, Coordination, and Connectivity.
These three issues present the greatest challenges when responding
to a mass casualty incident, especially incidents involving WMD.
Coordination and the need to use consistent terminology were cited.
Data collection and coordination of medical information put a heavy
burden on state and local authorities. However, the exercise demonstrated
that wide-scale hospital employment can be conducted, with 64 hospitals
in the Chicago area participating in one of the largest mass casualty
exercises ever conducted.
Post-TOPOFF 2: To enhance communications, coordination,
and connectivity, DHS and state and local authorities are working
on a range of improvements. The Emergency Operations Center (EOC)
and interoperability communications grants program administered
by DHS's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has made a total
of $81million available in FY 2002-2003 to improve state and local
emergency preparedness by ensuring that EOCs have the support and
telecommunications capabilities; which provide flexibility, sustainability,
security, survivability and interoperability. Projects funded by
these grants will encourage the acceptance of new technologies and
operating methods to assist communities in achieving interoperability
and connectivity. The INRP, NIMS, and the final NRP will all enhance
coordination through their standardization and unification of the
domestic response process. In the area of common response language,
the draft NIMS document will include standardized terminology and
key term descriptions for use by all responders at all levels.
* Jurisdiction. Jurisdiction addresses conflicts
or gaps in authorities, policies, and agreements under extremely
challenging circumstances. Participants at all levels of government
emphasized the value of exercises, such as TOPOFF 2, to explore
and refine the operational implications of these authorities. The
exercise fully validated the concept of the Department of Homeland
Security PFO, supported by a team of DHS subject experts. The PFOs
in both Seattle and Chicago facilitated integrated communications
and coordinated planning among federal, state, and local authorities.
Post-TOPOFF 2: This issue is being addressed
through the recent adoption of a National Exercise Program (NEP).
The NEP was developed by DHS's Office for Domestic Preparedness
(ODP) and an interagency team to ensure coordination for all of
the numerous exercises planned at the federal level. The NEP will
facilitate the development of homeland security exercises that test
and refine jurisdictional issues at the federal, state, and local
level and employ the new organizational guidelines of the INRP,
as our nation’s single response plan.
* Resource Allocation. Resource allocation encompasses the challenges
that require decision-makers to weigh conflicting needs and determine
how best to allocate limited resources. The analysis revealed some
challenges in the overall ability to identify and access additional
resources among federal, state, and local organizations. It also
noted that a "one-stop shop" for tracking the status of
federal assets, which had been activated or deployed during an emergency,
does not exist. The analysis concluded that decision-makers anticipated
future demands and validated the importance of pre-planning, specifically
citing Illinois' contingency plans for the receipt and distribution
of the Strategic National Stockpile.
Post-TOPOFF 2: The DHS Homeland Security Operations
Center, in conjunction with FEMA's National Emergency Operations
Center, tracks the deployment of federal resources across the government.
To improve that process, FEMA is establishing a standardized, automated
tracking system, which is the first step to electronically tracking
the resources and making that status available to state and local
governments. As part of NIMS, DHS is working collaboratively with
state and local governments to categorize resources and establish
a catalog of capabilities and availability.
Read the final public report - click
here.

•Date:
23rd December 2003 •Region: N.America •Type:
Article •Topic:
Terrorism
Rate
this article or make a comment - click
here
|