|
Research
by Synstar suggests that businesses are endangering their reputations
through a muddled approach to communications during a crisis.
Not even half of UK businesses (42 percent) involve communications
professionals in the management of crisis communications. Half of
those surveyed (50 percent) rely on the already over-burdened services
of a business continuity manager, or another senior business manager
to resolve critical situations and communicate with both internal
and external audiences.
More reassuringly, 58 percent would only nominate someone who is
media trained to deal with every day press enquiries. One third
(33 percent) selected spokespeople according to their area of crisis
expertise rather than seniority.
George Williams, head of communications at Synstar, remarks: “The
essence of crisis communications is keeping all those involved updated
so that they are able to make informed and educated decisions regarding
the respective incident. A business continuity manager can be doing
everything to contain a situation but leaked information to employees,
suppliers or the press can quickly undo this hard work.”
47 percent of senior IT business and business continuity managers
would issue a statement to the media at a point when the crisis
would affect their employee, supplier and/or customer relationships
if they did not. However, 14 percent would wait until it would influence
their share price or their investor relations if nothing was said,
whilst 39 percent would only release a statement when they had ‘something
to say’, by way of an update on how the crisis was being resolved.
www.synstar.com

•Date:
25th Nov 2004 • Region: UK/W.Europe •Type:
Article •Topic: BC
stats
Rate this article or make a comment - click
here
|