Monthly newsletter Weekly news roundup Breaking news notification    

Recovery facility market trends

Get free weekly news by e-mailThe provision of disaster related fail-over facilities has been the foundation upon which most of the main specialist business continuity service companies have built their businesses. However these are changing times for this market. ICM, the current UK ‘Business Continuity Provider of the Year’, is one of the UK’s main recovery facilities providers and its operations director, Mike Osborne, has provided Continuity Central with a list of the industry developments that he is seeing:

 

Continuity rather than disaster recovery led invocations
There is a trend towards more frequent but shorter invocations. Businesses are starting to use their ‘disaster recovery’ facility provision to solve production and service delivery problems rather than waiting for a full-scale disaster before invoking. This means that the recovery facility is seen much more as a day-to-day extension of a company’s business continuity management activities, rather than just as a last-resort disaster recovery solution. Many invocations are now lasting from just a few hours to a day. Some companies are changing their planning to focus, not so much on the occasional one-off major crisis, but on the 99 percent of ‘normal’ disruptions to operational continuity with a view that continuity provides an ‘always on’ solution that will also cover disasters.

Increased demand for high availability
With this always on view of continuity in mind, recovery facilities are increasingly becoming high availability based rather than being the hot, warm or cold sites of old. This is creating demand for the on-line hosting of servers within recovery facility locations for data replication and application failover purposes. Whilst data can be moved at the speed of light, total high availability also results in people issues coming to the fore:

Companies are starting to take the personal needs of their staff much more into account when selecting recovery facilities. They are considering such things as:

- Location: an hour’s travelling time from the normal production site is becoming the maximum normally considered for the location of the recovery facility. This ensures that staff don’t need to make unpopular, and expensive, overnight stays and means that normal child-care and family arrangements don’t need to be disrupted. Additionally, staff travelling times are increasingly becoming a limiting factor in the recovery time objective. Data failover systems mean that, should an invocation occur, staff are no longer sat around at recovery centres waiting for data tapes to arrive from a remote storage facility.

- Environment: the comfort of staff is being taken more into account, with recovery facilities mirroring as far as possible the usual working environment. Even the very choice of recovery provider could now be decided on which available fail-over site is more conducive to staff, particularly now that the technology of continuity is assumed as being well established.

- Services: no longer is it acceptable that the bare bones of a desk, chair and analogue telephone be provided. Instant ACD, Internet and e-mail are the corner stones of a viable continuity plan. In line with financial regulatory requirements, ICM is finding that clients are starting to request facilities for recording voice calls at recovery facilities.

In-house recovery facilities
With ‘always on’ at the forefront of continuity thinking and with proven technology from the major IT manufacturers readily available, there is a definite trend emerging to take recovery facility provision in-house. This gives companies more control over invocations that relate to the core applications that cannot withstand even the smallest amount of down-time. ICM sees this as an opportunity rather than a threat. Many companies using in-house recovery facilities contract for the design and supply, or return to service options provided by sister companies with the ICM Group stable, whilst ICM Recovery itself supplies ship-in and mobile recovery facilities to provide extra on-site support during invocations and tests. ICM can also act as a recovery centre construction company – helping clients build their own facilities using ICM’s experience and expertise.

The challenges of convergence
With IT and people well catered for, perhaps the final piece of the continuity puzzle of the future will be the convergence of telecoms and information technology. These are increasingly being built as one inseparable infrastructure. Communications systems are now as mission critical as computing systems are for most businesses.

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) will be a technology of increasing importance in 2004. The demand is not mainstream yet but undoubtedly will be. ICM is anticipating this by ensuring that all telephony systems used in recovery centres can be enabled for VoIP.

The five-year itch
2004 should be an interesting year for the recovery facility market. Many contracts tend to be signed on a five-year basis and Y2K issues saw a lot of new contracts being signed in 1999. These will be up for renewal in 2004. Many subscribers faced a Hobson’s Choice of ‘sign or risk going without’ on the run-up to Y2K and consequently the existing contract holders will have to compete hard to retain these legacy high-priced contracts and, where their clients elect to test the market, will certainly not be able to maintain the same price per seat that they were able to obtain in those heady days.

Indeed, since those heady days, we have seen many major names disappear through industry consolidation. Needless to say that if we are to see the existing providers evolve and flourish in the challenge of the future of business continuity, they will need to meet some of the points raised by ICM. It will be an interesting 2004 for the continuity industry.

www.icm-computer.co.uk

Date: 23rd December 2003 •Region: UK •Type: Article •Topic: Recovery facilities
Rate this article or make a comment - click here




Copyright 2005 Portal Publishing LtdPrivacy policyContact usSite mapNavigation help