|
By Steve Tongish
A great deal has been written recently about
a range of archival storage technologies, but very little is being
said about how these technologies should be properly integrated
into a long-term data storage strategy.
Many people consider archival storage as an
issue confined purely to the IT department, but it reaches far beyond.
Indeed, there are considerable legal and business implications to
the retention of important corporate and governmental records. As
a result, government agencies, industry regulators and corporations
have recently introduced a flood of new regulations and guidelines
controlling the storage and management of records. For example,
UK financial institutions are now required to keep mortgage loan
files for up to ten years after the loan has been repaid. Some medical
records must be stored throughout the life of the patient and UK
government institutions are now required to keep certain records
for up to 50 years and some are even to be made permanent in the
National Archives and Records Administration.
Regulations
typically specify retention times and requirements that records
be authentic, unaltered, readily accessible, dated and in a readable
format. Some regulations also mandate a duplicate copy of all originals
to be saved in a different geographical location to protect the
data from catastrophic site failure.
Businesses are expected to comply with these
new laws and regulations, but this is no small task. Not only must
they physically store the records, but many regulations demand that
a full history or audit trail be maintained to clearly document
where changes have been made. When called upon, they must also be
able to map out a ‘corporate memory’ of activities and
events that have been important to the history of the company (such
as contracts, agreements, customer records, design specifications,
e-mails), have affected past decisions and continue to influence
the running of the organisation into the future. The over-riding
requirement is that vital records satisfy the legal definition of
authenticity and can be deemed accurate, reliable and trustworthy.
The introduction of these new rules have led
to very costly penalties and, in some instances, have resulted in
high visibility court cases that have seriously damaged corporate
reputations. Five international brokerage houses were recently fined
$8.25 million for inadequate e-mail archive procedures and a major
corporation was fined $1 million for destroying court ordered records.
These examples demonstrate just how disruptive and expensive the
mismanagement or loss of vital records can be. How can companies
ensure that the archiving of electronic records meets the requirements
of their industry and keeps their company on the right side of the
law?
The key to addressing these demands lies in
the development of a proactive archive strategy. Archive storage
is often overlooked until a crisis is looming, at which stage many
IT managers respond by adding more magnetic disk or by purchasing
another tape drive. This approach will not meet the requirement
for a long-term, trustworthy archive and puts the company at risk
of prosecution if vital data can not be produced when required.
An archive strategy consisting of hardware, software and process
accountability should be planned carefully to make sure the information
being saved is well within any legal or corporate guidelines.
The initial stage of the planning process is
to identify exactly what needs to be done to ensure that records
are authentic when stored and retrieved. It’s no good being
able to store information if you can’t access it in 5-10 years
when the organisation is called upon to deliver important historical
information. Equally, it is no use to anyone if the records can
be retrieved, but the integrity of these records can not clearly
be established. Either of these failures can result in serious legal
and business consequences.
One key element in establishing archival storage
trustworthiness is to select the correct storage medium for the
task at hand. Since there are dramatically different site requirements,
no one storage technology will fit all archive environments. Optical,
tape and even magnetic disk storage has a place in the archive equation.
However, it is critical for companies to consider the demands of
their business before listening to hardware vendors that may be
trying to force-fit their technology into the archive space. The
wrong choice could prove very costly indeed.
Steve Tongish is marketing director (EMEA)
for Plasmon Data Ltd. Plasmon is exhibiting at Storage Expo, the
United Kingdom’s largest dedicated data storage event designed
to deliver the latest storage products on the market to more than
3,000 end users. The event is at Olympia in London from 15-16 October
2003. For more details, see www.storage-expo.com
MAKE
A COMMENT

•Date:18th
July 2003 •Region: UK/Worldwide •Type:
Article •Topic: IT
continuity
•Rate this article
or make a comment - click
here
|