|
The issues facing many firms considering subscribing to workplace
recovery facilities go further than merely the location, number
of seats available or subscription cost. There are technical issues,
which must be taken into account when planning for a swift and successful
recovery following an interruption. Andrew Waterston,
product development manager at SunGard Availability Services,
details the top three to look out for, and what technical capabilities
should be in place.
Telephony solutions, mirroring of PC set-ups
and the risk of your business continuity supplier having multiple
invocations all raise issues for today’s BC manager trying
to ensure a fast, low-risk recovery. In our experience, customers
are always looking for faster recovery solutions, but recent events
have made them increasingly conscious of the risks of multiple invocations.
Keeping your people and your information (be
this data or intellectual capital) connected is a vital part of
ensuring the availability of your business, addressing as it does
people issues, technology issues and communications issues. In our
experience this three-pronged ‘information availability’
approach is essential to moving business continuity to the next
level.
Telephony
One of the key areas of concern following interruption or disaster
is the handling of voice communications – in terms of both
volume and technology employed. While the use of e-mail and web
chat increases, these forms of communication will never replace
the need to talk to customers and suppliers. For this reason, no
matter how quickly a company recovers its data and computer systems,
if it is unable to make or receive phone calls efficiently, as far
as the rest of the world is concerned, it has ceased to exist.
The delivery of calls to the right person at
time of disaster is highly complex and requires the input of customer
IT staff specialising in this field. Yet, in our experience, telecoms
IT staff are rarely involved in the business continuity process,
while BC managers rarely understand the complicated telephony issues.
Three problems need to be considered. Firstly, the redirection and
handling of Geographic Direct Dial Inward (DDI) calls bearing in
mind the second problem, that the number of calls received invariably
increases in the event of a disaster as consumers look for reassurance.
To overcome these two issues cost-effectively requires complex configurations
running on highly advanced telephony platforms, and in multiple
invocations. This creates the third problem; the swift uploading
of multiple configurations onto the telephony environment without
interrupting service to companies who have already recovered.
Looking at these issues in turn, because of
the cost involved in redirecting multiple geographic numbers, recovery
contracts tend to redirect potentially hundreds of DDI numbers to
a single number. In simple telephone recovery environments, these
are then answered by an operator and connected to the correct person.
Whilst this sounds simple, it is worth recalling that, today, most
businesses receive a lesser number of calls via the switchboard
operator, and most go via DDI numbers. In a disaster you have an
upsurge of calls, a reduction in personnel to perhaps 20-30 per
cent of workforce and a loss of DDI functionality, so the standard
operator driven re-direction of DDI is based upon handling many
more calls than your switchboard operator normally would. Therefore,
if possible, BC managers should aim for telephony solutions that
require few or no operators, as a manual redirection process can
take time and is often rife with errors.
To alleviate these problems, BC managers should
look for recovery centres with telephone switches capable of delivering
services such as Interactive Voice Response (IVR), Automated Attendant
and Automatic Call Distribution. These automatically redirect calls
to the right person with no need for operators or a bespoke DDI
redirection service, regardless of the location of the person within
the recovery centre.
If the solution is deployed correctly, staff
can simply log in and out via the telephone handset when they arrive
and leave their desks, and incoming calls will be directed to them
using an IVR system to capture the right extension number.
SunGard believes this solution is so key to
a successful recovery that it provides it as part of its standard
service, with each customer provided with their own, unique configuration
and DDI numbers to enable them to set up redirection with their
telecoms provider. With your own BC provider, insist on regular
testing to maintain the telephony configuration to match the capabilities
of your own system.
Multiple invocations and telephony
If telephony has been considered in the recovery plan and a bespoke
configuration has been created, this is downloaded to the PABX at
time of disaster. However, this creates three problems in a multiple
invocation scenario. Firstly, each invoking party must have a unique
DDI number to redirect calls to; otherwise calls may be mixed up.
Secondly, each party needs to operate within their own discrete
and secure partition on the PABX to ensure that calls are not transferred
or overheard by the wrong party. Since few switches have this facility,
or alternatively it is limited to a maximum of two ‘tenants’,
maintaining confidentiality can be a real problem without the right
PABX. Finally, the biggest problem to be overcome is that of loading
multiple customer configurations into these discrete tenant partitions,
without interruption to the PABX operation. SunGard has developed
a proprietary software tool, SunGardCallControl, to establish multiple
customer environments discretely, with no loss of security, functionality
or speed of recovery. This is done without affecting any ‘incumbent’
customers.
Systems like this require the BC manager to
maintain plans and send updates to the provider so they can include
it in the configuration file. If this happens, on arrival at the
recovery centre, the staff merely login to whichever desk they have
been allocated and start to receive calls as normal without any
of the delays which manual call redirection would cause.
PC set-up
The problems associated with PC recovery are better known, but even
here, the implications of faster recovery, technology change, outsourcing
and multiple invocations are not always fully appreciated.
It is advisable, particularly if a firm subscribes
to more than one recovery location, that the PCs provided are of
exactly the same specification. It will reduce recovery times significantly
if companies can multi-cast a PC ghost image simultaneously across
all PCs logged on to a network, rather than have to configure them
individually. In practice, a same-specification recovery centre
means that a whole network of PCs can be set up in ten minutes,
rather than it taking thirty minutes to do one. Historically, delays
in PC recovery have not been seen as being a problem given the time
taken to recover the servers they are attached too. However, with
the trend towards mirrored, always available servers and applications,
the benefits of faster PC recovery are now being clearly seen.
As well as cutting recovery times, desktop
conformity and the adoption of sophisticated imaging methodologies
enables customer images to be operable in any suite or location
for enhanced service flexibility and efficiency. Companies who have
outsourced their desktop support benefit considerably from this
approach since they are frequently charged for every image created.
This hidden cost is often not considered during the business continuity
procurement process.
SunGard has recently refreshed its PCs across all recovery centres,
and as part of this process many customers have even sourced identical
PCs to enable them to build images ‘at home’ as part
of their production procedures. They then send these images to us
and know that if they need to test or recover they will have access
to a current desktop image and the latest applications, anywhere
in the country – a procedure which we advocate.
Having a standard PC is all very well but when
will it next be updated? BC managers should look for the timings
of PC refresh cycles and the methodology behind these to provide
certainty that the PCs will continue to offer the requisite functionality
for the life of the contract.
Multiple invocations – can your supplier handle them?
Workplace recovery is dogged by a particular question – what
happens if someone else invokes at the same time as me? Simultaneous
invocations on the same workplace recovery facility, while dramatic
and difficult to manage, are arguably less disruptive than consecutive
invocations, provided the facility has been set up correctly.
In a simultaneous recovery, the invoking parties
are aware of the difficulties of the other and tend to work together
to mutual benefit. The result may be that while recovery times may
be longer than normal, the additional disruption is ‘shared’
by both parties. In my opinion, the more difficult question to ask
is what happens if someone else invokes a few days after me? The
first invoking party has already recovered from one disaster; will
it then suffer further disasters while the second or third party
recovers, and while it is preparing to return home?
Experience has shown that if the first invoker
is not to be disrupted, the subsequent parties will experience a
considerable delay in meeting their recovery objectives. This is
why we have developed technology and methodologies that ensure that,
whether the invoking party is first or last, the plan and recovery
objectives remain the same and can be met.
To contact SunGard e-mail infoavail@sungard.com
or visit www.availability.sungard.com
MAKE
A COMMENT

•Date:11th
July 2003 •Region: Worldwide •Type:
Article •Topic: Recovery
facilities
•Rate this article
or make a comment - click
here
|