|
Patrick
McConnell explores the existing risk management standards which
could form the basis of Basel II ORM programmes.
In June 2004, the Basel Committee finally
released the ‘Revised Framework for the International Convergence
of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards’ - in effect,
the definitive Basel II proposals on operational risk. During the
three years prior to final publication, consultation with the industry
had resulted in a pronounced switch in emphasis, away from a mainly
quantitative, towards a more qualitative, approach to the management
of operational risk.
Under proposals for allowing ‘internationally
active’ banks to calculate capital using their own internal
models – so called AMA (Advanced Measurement Approaches) -
the Basel Committee backed away from dictating any explicit methodologies
for calculating operational risk capital charges, stressing instead
the importance of qualitative standards for management of operational
risks. Other than urging that an operational risk management system
must be “conceptually sound and implemented with integrity”,
Basel II, however, gave few clues as to what such a ‘system’
might look like. As banks (and their regulators) are about to begin
investing large sums of money and much time and effort in developing
the operational risk management systems necessary for Basel II,
it is timely to consider whether there are models outside of finance
that could usefully be employed in this context.
This paper argues that the wording of
Basel II is sufficiently vague that banks are in danger of developing
internal ORM systems that run the risk of not complying with interpretations
of Basel II by local supervisors. However, there are mature frameworks
from other industries upon which the processes of operational risk
management could be based. In particular, there are two risk management
standards - AS/NZS 4360/2004 and COSO/ERM – that, alone or
in combination, could satisfy the requirements of Basel II for systems
that are ‘conceptually sound’.
This paper also argues that the adoption
of operational risk management processes that are based on proven,
practical and usable standards, should reduce the overall costs
to the industry of complying with Basel II.
READ
THE PAPER (PDF)

•Date:
14th January 2005 •Region: World •Type:
Article •Topic: Operational
risk
Rate
this article or make a comment - click
here
|