|
by
Len Biegel, president, The Biegel Group
American businesses still have a long way to go in preparing to
face the threats of terrorism. While the largest of the Fortune
500 companies are more prepared than others, the truth is that medium
and small businesses have just as much at stake in this war on terrorism
but are not nearly as well prepared.
A survey by the American Management Association
shows that 64 percent of American companies, many in the medium
range with less than 5,000 employees, are prepared to face a crisis,
a term broadly defined to include any significant interruption to
operations ranging from a chemical spill to an act of terrorism.
This means that, in the midst of the war on terrorism, a disturbing
36 percent of medium size businesses do not have crisis plans and
are not prepared for an unexpected catastrophe of any type.
The latest report from The Conference Board
indicates more disturbing news – that only 28 percent of mid-market
companies have an off-site centre for emergency operations.
Some or all of these companies at least have
security guards at their doors or gates. But crisis plans and business
continuity plans go well beyond that, and include the essential
information senior management need to have at their fingertips in
a crisis, the infrastructure such as a ‘war room’ in
which to function during a crisis, communications guidelines, contingency
plans, and the like.
While the nation frets about, reacts to or
even becomes complacent about the government's colour-coded threat
levels and bureaucratic turf battles, the fact remains that American
businesses, not the US government, are in total control of a whopping
85 percent of the infrastructure of the United States!
It is time to take the mystery out of why so
many businesses remain unprepared – and take the steps to
prepare.
The excuses fail to justify American businesses’
lack of preparedness. Let's take a look:
Excuse: It's expensive to
create a plan.
Fact: Yes, it costs money,
but that expense is negligible compared to the cost of recovering
from a crisis that could have been prevented or managed so well
that the losses and disruptions were minimal. The cost of a crisis
is far more than the physical expense of destroyed goods or idled
labour. Your company’s precious asset – its reputation,
built carefully over the years – is on the line too. It only
takes one poorly managed crisis to send a company into a reputational
tailspin from which it may never recover.
Excuse: Who cares about my company? We make boring
products in an out of the way place.
Fact: On any given day, bad
things happen to good companies. Everything from tornadoes to employee
violence darken the doors of companies every day – the threat
of terrorism notwithstanding, which can surprise any company in
any location on any given day.
Excuse: Planning is complicated
and time consuming. And we just cannot afford the distraction.
Fact: You cannot afford not
to. Once companies accept crisis planning as a normal part of their
business, it becomes just that – a normal part of business.
Like factoring in time and expense for government clearances or
legal review, the more routine a company makes crisis planning,
the more accepted and efficient it becomes, and the more protected
your company is from the unexpected.
Excuse: Once the plan's in
the place I understand we need to train our people. And if that's
not enough, I hear we need to do periodic simulations. There is
no way we can take the time!
Fact: Yes, that is correct.
Training, like all other aspects of crisis planning, can and should
become a part of the company's routine. Simulations, whether annual
or semi-annual, are unusual and do disrupt the company routines
for the time they take. The most effective ones do not exceed four
hours plus another hour or two for debriefing to discuss lessons
learned and steps to take to improve. The big war games you hear
about are important, but leave those to the government agencies
responsible for protecting mass casualties.
There's an interesting plus to the simulations
which I have noticed over the years. A company invariably discovers,
during a simulation, a previously overlooked area of operations
that, if corrected, may prevent a crisis. It doesn't get much better
than that.
The bottom line is simple. Every day spent in denial is a day a
company places itself deeper into risky waters. Today's crisis planning
is based on a paradigm which evolved from the now-famous Tylenol
tamperings of the mid-1980s and changed yet again with the calamity
of 9/11, and is based on two core principles:
* The simpler the plan the better.
* A commitment must be made to make planning
and training part of company culture.
Where to start? It's simple – the beginning!
Take a long, hard look at all the vulnerabilities of your company
– from terrorism to scandal to natural disasters. Alongside
each potential disaster on the list, give your company a score,
from one to 10 – to indicate how well prepared you are to
manage each crisis, should it occur; to continue operations at essential
levels; and to recover.
If your company needs further motivation, consider
the competitive advantage of joining those companies who work every
day to improve their crisis preparedness and leaving your competitors
in the ranks of the 36 percent of the unprepared. And if nothing
else motivates you to work on a crisis plan for your company on
a calm day, then you may want to get to work on the explanations
you will need to deliver to shareholders, customers, government
investigators and the media in the midst of a crisis about why you
were not prepared.
Len Biegel is president of The Biegel Group
of Washington, D.C. He works with corporations and industry groups
throughout the United States on crisis communications and management
organisation. He was a member of the crisis management team involved
in the Tylenol tamperings in the 1980s and his current work involves
Homeland security issues as a consultant to The Business Roundtable
and as an advisor to the McGraw-Hill Homeland Security Summit.
www.thebiegelgroup.com
Download
a print friendly version (PDF)
MAKE
A COMMENT

•Date:
3rd September 2004 •Region: N.America •Type:
Article •Topic: BC
general
Rate this article or
make a comment - click
here
|